Excellent! Recommended! - Just seen "Mumbai Monologues" at TAPAC theatre, Western Springs, Auckland. Only one more performance left as I write this: Sun 16 Feb 2014 at 4pm. Directed by Ahi Karunaharan and Padma Akula who stage 8 stories with live music and song including original compositions.
"Nisha" played by Monica Mahendru is a single woman trying to make sense of the dating scene. Mirroring this is a male point of view performed by Raj Singh in "Mumbai Nights". Both gave us a mix of poignancy and comedic observation. In "Tension Nehi Lene Ka", Tina Pan plays a tourist to Mumbai trying to cope on a crowded train well played by the ensemble. In "The Pitch", Nona Shedde plays a professional woman handling a job interview with great bravado then afterwards sharing her vulnerability with us. A universal theme here of the loss of job security for many - this could be any business professional anywhere with career and status hanging by a thread. A different angle comes from "Wish You Were Here" where younger characters feel jaded rather than insecure with their bright "glitzy" life.
"Mumbai Monologues" is part of the Queer@TAPAC festival and offers 3 queer-themed pieces. In "Adrift" we meet Natasha played by Anya Banerjee, a young woman now living in NZ who is coming to terms with her bisexuality. In "Section 377", Faisal, a heterosexual character, played by Aman Bajaj, laments how his best friend who happens to be homosexual is effectively exiled by India's anti-homosexuality laws. In "Memories", Emma, played by Anita Crisinel tells the story of her wonderful childhood friend who turned against Emma out of intolerance when they grew up.
A universal journey through more than Mumbai. Presented with passion, skill and craft.
Saturday, February 15, 2014
Monday, January 13, 2014
Australia Travel - Internet Access - 3G works better than WiFi
Travelling in Australia 31 Dec 2013 to 13 Jan 2014. I found WiFi facilities were expensive and often not working well. What worked well for me was a "Telstra" Australian SIM card for my cellphone. AUD $30 bundled with a 1 month prepay package including 500Meg of data. I worked out how to connect my laptop to the cellphone so the laptop could feed off that 500Meg. Internet was then all go for me and at a good speed. I did take the precaution of switching "Windows Update" from automatic to manual to keep that usage under control. Telstra had coverage in most of the places I went, including some remote areas. The only place I was without coverage was the very remote "King's Canyon" west of Alice Springs.
Details.
Details.
- You need to have ID with you to buy a SIM card.
- Monitor usage by using the cellphone to visit website "m.telstra.com"
- My cellphone had an "Internet Sharing" setting which worked well.
Thursday, January 10, 2013
Smart cellphones as audio recorders - OK casual - Pro needs better
Continuing story .. smart cellphones as audio recorders. We can download apps for most of them which record wav files. Exciting idea - can this give us readily available high quality indie audio recorders? I now think "no" as in not yet, or not with the phones we/friends/family currently have.
Story so far: Good early results with voice recording for film with the very low cost "Vodafone 858" - a Huawai Android. More use as a backup recorder reveals electrical interference issues eg nearby electric fences. Ref earlier post "Do Androids Dream of Electric Fences" here:
http://iafilm.blogspot.co.nz/2012/12/do-androids-dream-of-electric-fences.html
New results:
I also find that high sound levels in music performances cause the little Android to distort, as in the app or the phone does not do automatic level setting or needs to do it better.
This last week I have been getting to know a Windows Phone 7.5 LG Quantum from the older lower end of the current Windows Phone system. Similar result - OK for informal tests and student exercises but not quite good enough for serious indie production. No result yet on electrical interference. Loud sounds cause distortion like I observe with the Androids.
Most interesting Windows Phone result is that with a variety of recording software including an "Ultimate" app I paid for, the sample rate was always a relatively low 16khz with no controls for increasing that. I am a computer programmer, mostly "Windows", so I set out to study microphone programming. Interesting finding with wider implications is that the microphone behaviour is fixed and programming starts with the chips passing the software audio that is already digitised at 16khz. So even with original programming with the "Dot Net" system I can do nothing about that 16khz. The "xna" programming library of functions also offers no control over recording level. I am intrigued though to discover in "OneNote Mobile" a notes sound recording function which gives very low quality but does seem to give an automatic recording level effect as in I speak very loudly into it and it copes.
QUESTION - Is microphone behaviour locked into the silicon chip design, or is there some deep low-level programming in the wider "Windows" outside of "Dot Net" that can change this?
QUESTION - If microphone behaviour is in the chip, would different brands of phones with different chips behave differently? If you are reading this and you have a smartphone, you can use the blog messaging system to contact me and join in the test recording fun going on here.
THOUGHT - This experience suggests that Phone programming is about glueing together sub systems that are very much already programmed for us, and the internal-based parts of "Apps" are really about alternative presentations of what is already there. ie "Apps" are relatively easy and also limited - until we get into the area of doing more by connecting over the internet to a high-powered server to add more power to our problem-solving.
Story so far: Good early results with voice recording for film with the very low cost "Vodafone 858" - a Huawai Android. More use as a backup recorder reveals electrical interference issues eg nearby electric fences. Ref earlier post "Do Androids Dream of Electric Fences" here:
http://iafilm.blogspot.co.nz/2012/12/do-androids-dream-of-electric-fences.html
New results:
I also find that high sound levels in music performances cause the little Android to distort, as in the app or the phone does not do automatic level setting or needs to do it better.
This last week I have been getting to know a Windows Phone 7.5 LG Quantum from the older lower end of the current Windows Phone system. Similar result - OK for informal tests and student exercises but not quite good enough for serious indie production. No result yet on electrical interference. Loud sounds cause distortion like I observe with the Androids.
Most interesting Windows Phone result is that with a variety of recording software including an "Ultimate" app I paid for, the sample rate was always a relatively low 16khz with no controls for increasing that. I am a computer programmer, mostly "Windows", so I set out to study microphone programming. Interesting finding with wider implications is that the microphone behaviour is fixed and programming starts with the chips passing the software audio that is already digitised at 16khz. So even with original programming with the "Dot Net" system I can do nothing about that 16khz. The "xna" programming library of functions also offers no control over recording level. I am intrigued though to discover in "OneNote Mobile" a notes sound recording function which gives very low quality but does seem to give an automatic recording level effect as in I speak very loudly into it and it copes.
QUESTION - Is microphone behaviour locked into the silicon chip design, or is there some deep low-level programming in the wider "Windows" outside of "Dot Net" that can change this?
QUESTION - If microphone behaviour is in the chip, would different brands of phones with different chips behave differently? If you are reading this and you have a smartphone, you can use the blog messaging system to contact me and join in the test recording fun going on here.
THOUGHT - This experience suggests that Phone programming is about glueing together sub systems that are very much already programmed for us, and the internal-based parts of "Apps" are really about alternative presentations of what is already there. ie "Apps" are relatively easy and also limited - until we get into the area of doing more by connecting over the internet to a high-powered server to add more power to our problem-solving.
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
Camera upgrade - selected Sony NEX 5N - results Part 1
Some past posts were about what camera we should use for our upcoming green screen experimental feature. Made selection, done deal, I went for a Sony NEX 5N
This was on a special reduced price here in New Zealand.
I am guessing that had something to do with newer NEX models coming out.
I am guessing that had something to do with newer NEX models coming out.
The reviews suggest that this model 5N does video better than the newer ones.
I had some concerns at the need to buy a 50fps PAL model. I did consider trying to buy a secondhand 60fps NTSC example from EBAY. Some web searching indicated that most target film festivals can handle 50fps or the obvious 25fps derivative video. NTSC conversion is do-able for us based on experience with our short film "Laputa" as described elsewhere in this blog.
[Aside note - I suggest that this whole 2 alternative model thing that camera manufacturers do has become obsolete and they should sell us NTSC everywhere for consumer and semi-pro cameras. Most computers systems are effectively NTSC and all modern TVs and Projectors can do both. The flourescent light flicker rate issue is easily fixed with shutter speeds of 100, 50 or 25.]
Some first results and impressions.
Green Screen
YES - best results I have ever seen from our testing, which is a relief after buying this camera based on reports from others. Test here is where the subject (me) is moving around a lot - story is riding in an SUV on a bumpy road - this is the test that has caused the most problems for other tested cameras. This image is taken from the video in the middle of one of my highest speed action movements - leaning sideways.
Tech. Kit lens manual settings with slight under-exposure. Shutter speed 1/100 sec. Tungsten lighting. Scene setting "Normal". Video best setting 50fps and 28Mbps.
Moire problems?
NOT FOR US. Some reviewers state that there are "moire" issues with the NEX 5N but we have seen nothing in 3 weeks so far of operation with a variety of tests and 1 production shoot so far. But note that the way we film puts us at low risk of moire issues.
Use prime lens collection?
YES - this works well! I have now bought a collection of lens adapters from EBAY store "jiakgong". 1980 vintage lenses from my Russian Zenit camera adapt just fine and working with them is straightforward. I am about to start testing borrowed Nikon lenses. Images following are an experiment in taking the zone-focussing capability to artistic extremes.
1. Kit Lens, moderate zone focussing ...
2. Russian Helios Lens f=58mm, aperture=f/8, shutter=1/100
3. Russian Helios Lens f=58mm, aperture=f/2, shutter=1/500 - ZONE TO THE MAX
Can NEX 5N make my 1953 vintage Bolex 16mm movie camera live again?
PARTLY - It is possible to adapt the 1953 C-Mount lenses to the NEX 5N but they cover an area just over 10mm wide in the centre of the 20mm wide sensor. This area is about 2000 pixels across so in theory with a re-sampling digital zoom control the old 16mm lenses could ride again. BUT the NEX-5N digital zoom switches off for video. Therefore this lens collection can deliver reasonable stills, but for video the result needs to crop to about 800 x 450 pixels. ie NEX 5N can party like it's 1953 but only in standard definition. I read that new NEX models coming out starting with the NEX-EA50 will have a digital zoom that can resample. This leads me to a cheeky comment about the "Digital Bolex" project to make a camera that is the "spiritual successor to the Bolex". My opinion: guys you are too late - NEX has already got there and it looks like Panasonic is heading in this direction as well.
Wednesday, December 26, 2012
Do Androids Dream of Electric Fences?
In my previous posts I have sung the praises of cellphones as portable sound recorders. We have done some good trials with Android smart phones running the downloaded app "PCM Recorder" - until last week when recording in a farmhouse and getting a rhythmic "click" noise on recordings.
Our farmer hostess suggested "Electric Fence" and we confirmed that after some more tests including a test recording in the nearby town.
This cellphone is a low-cost Vodafone 858 made by Huawai. In other tests it has done well in electrically noisy environments which have given trouble to other devices but we now discover that it is vulnerable to electric fences and we will need to be alert about other interference possibilities.
We were filming piano performances with a Sony NEX 5N camera. Fortunately the on-camera mics did a good enough job, without clicks, but needing a little hiss removal in post.
In images below I have zoomed in on the y-axis to enlarge clicks which have a peak height of -36 dB.
Our farmer hostess suggested "Electric Fence" and we confirmed that after some more tests including a test recording in the nearby town.
This cellphone is a low-cost Vodafone 858 made by Huawai. In other tests it has done well in electrically noisy environments which have given trouble to other devices but we now discover that it is vulnerable to electric fences and we will need to be alert about other interference possibilities.
We were filming piano performances with a Sony NEX 5N camera. Fortunately the on-camera mics did a good enough job, without clicks, but needing a little hiss removal in post.
In images below I have zoomed in on the y-axis to enlarge clicks which have a peak height of -36 dB.
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Laputa online at Youtube
"Laputa" Version 2. A completed version at last. Began as a wildly and wonderfully over-ambitious entry in the NZ "V" 48 Hours competition in May 2011. Over 1 year later the animation, fx, green-screen, audio, editing is done and the festival- only period is over, so hello Youtubers!.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hw9MoOLqUs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hw9MoOLqUs
Friday, November 16, 2012
Our next movie - what camera to use - Part 2
Part 1 is down 3 posts from this one, or if you are seeing posts separately then the direct link is:
http://iafilm.blogspot.co.nz/2012/10/our-next-movie-what-camera-to-use.html
In brief, we think it is now possible to shoot an experimental no-budget feature in a borrowed classroom with a green screen setup. The big enabler is the improvements in video editing software, eg the "Keylight" compositing plugin in "Adobe After Effects". Sharing some thoughts from further reading, asking questions and running some more tests.
We have run tests with borrowed Canon HV20, Canon HF R20 and Sanyo VPC-HD2000. This opened a whole new issue in that we discover we like the 60p (60 full frames per second) high frame rate of the Sanyo. So now we gotta go 60p, or maybe 50p because we are in PAL territory New Zealand. Further details.
Sanyo VPC-HD2000 - We were able to test this briefly. We kept it simple and set it to preset "sports" following advice that a high shutter speed is a good idea. Clear winner for a clean key result including movement at 60p and we like the 60p look. Colours were warm and over-saturated but if we had more time with this we could probably explore its settings and do better. The Sanyo dates from 2009 and was a cutting-edge camera then. We and other bloggers note that Panasonic have now bought Sanyo and 60p has since been appearing on Panasonic cameras so we are guessing that Panasonics with 60p are the children of this Sanyo and worth further investigation.
Canon HV20 - an "old" as in over 5 years old cam. HD 1920 x 1080 on tape using MPEG-2. The attraction was that this has more manual control than the other cams we have access to. We ran this at 25p. Very good keying results until we do subject movement then we do not like what happens. Staccato quality of movement and on reversing direction subject heads seem to have a ghost image that shows up by lagging a little behind the main image. We ran trials at shutter speeds of 1/50sec and 1/250sec following some theory that 1/250 would be good but we can see no significant difference. Our all-green-screen short film "Laputa" shot with an HV20 is now online at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hw9MoOLqUs
Canon HF R20 - amazingly good camera for its low price of USD 280. We tried 24p, 30p and 60i frame rates. 30p was best with 24p a close second - both were good for keying but some of our viewers did not like the subject movement especially motion blur on human subjects. Best keying with "cine" setting. Could be used for a green screen epic which is low on subject movement - and that may be the case with our possible literature-based drama.
What others are saying about green screen work - with my personal comments
"Compression is bad - you need very high bit rate technology" - eg Blackmagic HDMI capture, Panasonic GH3. I disagree on this and I suggest that the AVCHD-2 standard of 60p at 28 Mbps is a viable, low cost accessible way to go.
Argument from theory - AVCHD temporal compression works by recycling non-moving background elements and is going to work at its best efficiency with a simple background ie a green screen.
Argument from experiment - with the Canon HF R20 we have done trials at bit rates of 5Mbps and 24Mbps and 5Mbps looks remarkably good and not much different to 24 Mbps.
"Cine setting is good" - Agree
"Use 'hard colour' setting in Keylight rather than the default 'soft colour' setting" - Agree, has made a good improvement to our trials and also in re-working some older shorts. Thanks to the Dastoli Brothers website for this advice.
So the continuing question of what camera?
Top of the desirable list is the soon to be released Panasonic GH3. Testing website www.digitalcamerainfo.com names this in their 2012 awards article as the best system camera for video. Too expensive for us and we will need to go more modest for our quickie experimental feature. Top priorities for our spending are likely to be food and transportation. Maybe we can find someone who has bought this or similar to join the co-op as guest camera operator even for some of the shooting? We have done this kind of thing before!
Candidates are 1080p60 capable cameras and we would like to go digital large sensor lens-interchangable. Some models we are investigating are:
Panasonic G5 - Some impressive sample videos on Youtube but conflicting opinions expressed on the web about possible limitation of manual control of settings for video. Trying to find out more.
Sony NEX-5N, Sony A-57 - Mostly good reviews but with some warnings about "moire" effect and I have seen this in sample videos on Youtube eg when tiled roofs get into shot. Trying to find out more. Maybe a green screen production is less likely to hit moire situations than shooting in the wider world?
Interesting Web links:
"Dastoli Digital - Simple Tricks and Nonsense"
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2B20D1B93B68C825
"Sony NEX-5R vs Panasonic G5: Four Reasons to Buy the Sony NEX-5R OVER the Panasonic G5"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6fLAxbbEIg
Sony Alpha NEX-5N Review with lab testing including video capabilities testing.
http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/content/Sony-NEX-5N-Digital-Camera-Review.htm
http://iafilm.blogspot.co.nz/2012/10/our-next-movie-what-camera-to-use.html
In brief, we think it is now possible to shoot an experimental no-budget feature in a borrowed classroom with a green screen setup. The big enabler is the improvements in video editing software, eg the "Keylight" compositing plugin in "Adobe After Effects". Sharing some thoughts from further reading, asking questions and running some more tests.
We have run tests with borrowed Canon HV20, Canon HF R20 and Sanyo VPC-HD2000. This opened a whole new issue in that we discover we like the 60p (60 full frames per second) high frame rate of the Sanyo. So now we gotta go 60p, or maybe 50p because we are in PAL territory New Zealand. Further details.
Sanyo VPC-HD2000 - We were able to test this briefly. We kept it simple and set it to preset "sports" following advice that a high shutter speed is a good idea. Clear winner for a clean key result including movement at 60p and we like the 60p look. Colours were warm and over-saturated but if we had more time with this we could probably explore its settings and do better. The Sanyo dates from 2009 and was a cutting-edge camera then. We and other bloggers note that Panasonic have now bought Sanyo and 60p has since been appearing on Panasonic cameras so we are guessing that Panasonics with 60p are the children of this Sanyo and worth further investigation.
Canon HV20 - an "old" as in over 5 years old cam. HD 1920 x 1080 on tape using MPEG-2. The attraction was that this has more manual control than the other cams we have access to. We ran this at 25p. Very good keying results until we do subject movement then we do not like what happens. Staccato quality of movement and on reversing direction subject heads seem to have a ghost image that shows up by lagging a little behind the main image. We ran trials at shutter speeds of 1/50sec and 1/250sec following some theory that 1/250 would be good but we can see no significant difference. Our all-green-screen short film "Laputa" shot with an HV20 is now online at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hw9MoOLqUs
Canon HF R20 - amazingly good camera for its low price of USD 280. We tried 24p, 30p and 60i frame rates. 30p was best with 24p a close second - both were good for keying but some of our viewers did not like the subject movement especially motion blur on human subjects. Best keying with "cine" setting. Could be used for a green screen epic which is low on subject movement - and that may be the case with our possible literature-based drama.
What others are saying about green screen work - with my personal comments
"Compression is bad - you need very high bit rate technology" - eg Blackmagic HDMI capture, Panasonic GH3. I disagree on this and I suggest that the AVCHD-2 standard of 60p at 28 Mbps is a viable, low cost accessible way to go.
Argument from theory - AVCHD temporal compression works by recycling non-moving background elements and is going to work at its best efficiency with a simple background ie a green screen.
Argument from experiment - with the Canon HF R20 we have done trials at bit rates of 5Mbps and 24Mbps and 5Mbps looks remarkably good and not much different to 24 Mbps.
"Cine setting is good" - Agree
"Use 'hard colour' setting in Keylight rather than the default 'soft colour' setting" - Agree, has made a good improvement to our trials and also in re-working some older shorts. Thanks to the Dastoli Brothers website for this advice.
So the continuing question of what camera?
Top of the desirable list is the soon to be released Panasonic GH3. Testing website www.digitalcamerainfo.com names this in their 2012 awards article as the best system camera for video. Too expensive for us and we will need to go more modest for our quickie experimental feature. Top priorities for our spending are likely to be food and transportation. Maybe we can find someone who has bought this or similar to join the co-op as guest camera operator even for some of the shooting? We have done this kind of thing before!
Candidates are 1080p60 capable cameras and we would like to go digital large sensor lens-interchangable. Some models we are investigating are:
Panasonic G5 - Some impressive sample videos on Youtube but conflicting opinions expressed on the web about possible limitation of manual control of settings for video. Trying to find out more.
Sony NEX-5N, Sony A-57 - Mostly good reviews but with some warnings about "moire" effect and I have seen this in sample videos on Youtube eg when tiled roofs get into shot. Trying to find out more. Maybe a green screen production is less likely to hit moire situations than shooting in the wider world?
Interesting Web links:
"Dastoli Digital - Simple Tricks and Nonsense"
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2B20D1B93B68C825
"Sony NEX-5R vs Panasonic G5: Four Reasons to Buy the Sony NEX-5R OVER the Panasonic G5"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6fLAxbbEIg
Sony Alpha NEX-5N Review with lab testing including video capabilities testing.
http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/content/Sony-NEX-5N-Digital-Camera-Review.htm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)